Showing posts with label Movies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Movies. Show all posts

25 November 2012

Not Sure If Related...: Djibril Cisse and Laurence Fishburne

It's been a long while since I last posted a "Not Sure If Related..." page. So here's another one I stumbled upon just yesterday night.

So yesterday was Saturday and that meant football night here in the Philippines for me. My favorite team, Manchester United, is set to fight London outfit Queens Park Rangers at 11:00 PM local time. Until then, I turned the TV to HBO and watched 'Contagion' - this was just to expend time, as I already watched the movie when it was released some time ago.

Djibril Cisse portrait retrieved from The Telegraph UK
Laurence Fishburne portrait retrieved from filmsplusmovies.com

An hour later, the movie still wasn't finished but I had to switch to the game, for it was already on. Just before half-time, I saw QPR's Djibril Cisse do a cool pass towards his teammate Jamie Mackie who headed the ball into the net. The goal was disallowed for Mackie was offside (See the full match review of the Manchester United v QPR game here). The camera then pans to Cisse to get his reaction. At that point, 'Contagion' came back to me. Cisse looked like Laurence Fishburne!

Check out their portraits side-by-side above. You be the judge.

02 November 2012

Kanzler's Movie Review: Scarface ('Nuff Said)

Image retrieved from Wikipedia

(Disclaimer: While stringent measures have been done to avoid placing spoilers in the following review, some movie elements placed below may still appear as spoilers to some people. Readers may choose to skip the synopsis and proceed to the opinion part further below.)

When one mentions the name Al Pacino, a lot of adjectives follow, but the ones you'd likely hear the most would be "great", "legend" and "epic". And he has proven himself worthy of those adjectives from the great roles he has done in numerous movies throughout the years. While some critics would disagree with me, one of those films is Scarface.

Scarface is a 1983 film by Brian de Palma about a narcissistic political refugee named Tony Montana (Pacino) who arrives to the United States after Castro orders mass emigration of Cubans due to economic problems. As soon as Montana hits US soil, he knew he was destined for great things.

After successfully finishing his first "job offer" from a rich drug dealer named Frank Lopez (Robert Loggia), the murder of a former Cuban high official also living in the same refugee camp as Montana's, he and his close friend Manny (Steven Bauer) land a daily wage-earning stint in a small burger joint. Discontent, he confronts Omar Suarez (Murray Abraham), Frank's henchmen, and the latter tells them about buying drugs from Colombians. The buy fails, and one of Montana's friends dies in the process. Manny was there to say Montana, and the two kill off the Colombians. Distrustful, Montana insists on delivering the package straight to Frank, instead of giving them to Omar.

Montana kills off one of the Colombians
Image retrieved from Clothes on Film

From this gutsy move, Tony Montana gets the respect of Lopez. Tony quickly moves up the ranks and is sent with Omar to Bolivia to negotiate with drug lord Al Sosa (Paul Shenar). Tony strikes a deal with the Bolivian, and Omar is taken out of the equation by Sosa's henchman. Upon his return in the US, Frank disagrees with how Tony handled the job and they go their separate ways.

Montana now repeatedly meets Frank's girlfriend Elvira (Michelle Pfieffer), and tells her of his plans about her. Elvira is reluctant, ultimately unresponsive towards Tony's move on her. On the other hand, Frank plots Montana's death. After a threat/offer from Frank's police friend Mal Bernstein (Harris Yulin) falls on deaf ears, an attempt to kill Tony materializes. It also fails, but not without enraging the hot-tempered Montana. He with his men go to Frank's place, finds Bernstein there, and kills them both. With Frank out of the question, Montana persuades Elvira to go with him.

Tony & Elvira dancing at Frank's favorite place
Image retrieved from home-of-hip-hop.tumblr.com

Tony Montana becomes an expert of the trade and hauls in a lot of money. With his partnership with Al Sosa growing, his relationship with Elvira and best friend Manny deteriorates. Tony is hit with a tax evasion charge and he blames Manny for all the recent string of problems. All the while, Tony blames Elvira because she can't give him a child. Elvira soon leaves Tony. With Tony on the verge of serving a jail sentence, Al Sosa offers a way out through his powerful contacts. In exchange, Tony helps Sosa get rid of a journalist attempting to expose the Bolivian to the UN.

With Tony's instability, the assassination fails. Sosa is exposed and like a wounded lion, plots his revenge against Montana. Montana's mansion is soon overrun by Sosa's soldiers, and they easily pick off Montana's guards and corner Tony himself in his room. Tony kills off a number of them using a grenade launcher, but their number was soon too much for the narcissistic Cuban, who gets repeatedly shot until he falls in his own pool of blood.

Pacino doing the trademark "Say hello to my little friend!"
Image retrieved from The Reelist

During its release, many critics slammed the film for being over-extravagant, over-stylized and excessive, or as Simon Cowell would say, "too over the top." And yet, the film's earnings showed how much different the moviegoers felt. Over time, the movie would soon rise to its now legendary status.

In some ways, this film could be seen as a ramped-up, extreme version of Martin Scorcese's 1990 film, Goodfellas. A guy, engulfed by money and power, was soon broken is the central theme of Scarface, albeit to outlandish levels. If you look at it, you can actually view it as how critic Richard Roeper puts it, a "kind of B-movie version of The Godfather (Link to source)," which, at some point, actually is. Ultimately, the movie can be deduced to two words: crime pays.

While it may be true that the excesses the film took was nothing more than facetious gratification, it was that stark showing that was key to the movie's success in sending its message. The theatrical, over-the-top portrayal of the roles is just spot-on, especially for a stature of Al Pacino.

Pacino fits well in Tony Montana's shoes. His grand gestures, his witty remarks, all his subtle movements show the method to the madness. Montana's almost bipolar personality can only be delivered so well. It's a proven fact: Pacino is a master actor.

The grandiose picturing of violence in this film, compounded by thin lines of morality, particularly those dutifully displayed through Pacino's superb acting, show an full-impact reality of the world, and how it allows you temporary satisfaction of a small part of its riches for your soul.

When all is said and done, Scarface is simply put, a classic.

20 October 2012

Kanzler's Movie Review: Circling My Head on "Looper"

Image retrieved from "Man, I Love Films"

I don't usually post blogs on movie reviews, but I thought it's about time I started doing so with this cool film.

To say that Looper is a routine movie is way out of line. To say it pulled a Mind Screw like Inception effortlessly, however, would also be a bit off the mark. Looper is a film that, pun intended, would make your brain run in circles, which, at some points, leave you just confused.

Looper is a sci-fi movie set in 2044 with the protagonist Joe, played by Levitt, who's making a living as an assassin. There's a catch: He assassinates people from the future, who are brought back to his time via a time machine. It is when he is tasked to kill his future self (Bruce Willis) that things go loopy, so to speak.

(Disclaimer: Spoilers ahead, even if I still did many elements of the story out of my narration.)

Through a series of point-blank, no-nonsense flashbacks, Joe actually succeeds in killing his old self and gets the huge bounty for doing so - think of it as your separation pay after a long tenure. He grows old, falls in love, lives the high life (though of crime), knowing that after 30 years, he would be assassinated. When his time arrives, he objects to it, but still goes back to the past, albeit now with a different reason.

Image retrieved from http://tinribs27.wordpress.com

After a not-so-good first meeting, Old Joe tells Young Joe that there's this big boss in the future named "Rainmaker" who's pulling all the strings. As to how he's related to one of Grisham's characters is something I'd discover some other time. Anyhow... the big man now wants all the loopers killed. Old Joe went back to the past to kill the rainmaker when he's still a child. Young Joe tells Old Joe he doesn't care, and that the young must kill the old to get things back in order. Old Joe didn't take this too well. A fight ensues, and Young Joe (YJ from now on, same with Old Joe - OJ) discovers OJ's plan. YJ goes to protect OJ's child target.

The thing is, YJ developed some sort of attachment with the child, named Cyd (who's a telekinetic - another outlandish sci-fi ingredient) and his mother, Sara (played by Emily Blunt). They got er, really close, and this made YJ want to protect the child even more. Despite the fact that YJ discovered the child is indeed the future rainmaker, he still goes out of his way to guard the child from his older self, who finally arrives at the epicenter. OJ aims his gun at the child, the mom blocks the route of fire, OJ shoots nonetheless and ends up missing the target. The future is certain at that point.

Or is it?

Somewhere between this cascade, though, YJ sees through all the circles and discovers that he is Rainmaker's creator. This is one of the greats of this movie. The title itself is a subtle, invisible foreshadowing of the whole story. I only realized it till I walked out of the theater. You see, OJ's plan was to kill the child Rainmaker, right? But the mom wouldn't let him, so OJ kills the mom, making for a psychologically-unstable child with freaky telekinetic powers (Think of that music video of David Guetta's "Titanium") that'd pave the way for the development of the sadistic villain. Confused? This diagram of the film's timeline should help:

Image retrieved from Wired.com
(Click image to enlarge)

Another thing cool about this movie is how it pulled a Chekhov's Gun really well. It hinted nonchalantly of telekinetic people very early in the film. It turns out that power would have a great impact on the film's plot.

In all the spot-on acting, the brilliant writing of the plot, the movie lacked something. Somehow, somewhere, it made me lose my suspension of disbelieve. Perhaps it's the telekinesis thing? Perhaps it's the way the movie used time travel? I can't say for sure. It's something about how it toys with realism (or at least how realism should appear) and the fact that this stark manipulation is taken so... lightly, as if the radicalness of it all was non-existent.

Overall, the film sure got my head in circles. It's a great film, a very good mind screw movie that played all its cards right but somehow didn't win all the chips on the table. Still, not bad... not bad at all. If you want a watch that makes your brain tick, then Looper would certainly give you a run for your money.

27 April 2012

Who Was That Guy Again?: Not Well-known But Great Actors

So, does he look familiar?
Image taken from Wikipedia

I have recently watched The Avengers and I tell you, it really packs a wallop. The plot is solid, and the actors are top-notch, if not only stellar and star-studded. But some of the actors in there are those you know you already watched before, and they're really good, but you just can't seem to remember their name. Take the guy whose picture is above. That guy is Stellan Skarsgard. I knew of him and well, his name, when I watched Angels and Demons (He was the director of security). He did great acting there. Not only that, he also had roles in other brilliant films like Good Will Hunting (He was the math professor classmate of Robin Williams' character, Dr. Lambeau), the Pirates of the Carribean series (He was Bootstrap Bill Turner - bet you didn't know that), Thor and of course, the Avengers (He was Dr. Erik Selvig in both Thor and The Avengers).

Putting those handful of films in retrospect, you'll realize that this guy's a great actor who starred in smashing, block-buster movies, and yet it seems that not many people know him. Quite unfortunate, ain't it?

Here are some other actors who do great acting and starred in popular roles but don't seem to get much attention, the actors whose names just slip through our minds.

Image taken from Rotten Tomatoes

Keith David is another great actor whose name many of us would forget. He had starred in films like Stomp the Yard 2, Behind Enemy Lines: Colombia, Agent Cody Banks and Death at a Funeral. His main asset is his deep, resounding voice, so much so that he has lent his voice to many video games, most considerably Mass Effect and Call of Duty. I particularly liked him in his role in Agent Cody Banks as well as his voice work on The Princess and The Frog. Cool movies, those two.

Image taken from fanpop.com

If you immediately recognized this actor from the name alone, then I commend you. I myself had to search for his name since even I didn't know of it before I typed in this paragraph! All I know is that I liked his roles in Home Alone 2 and Criminal Minds so he had to be put in this list, right? Besides his roles in those I mentioned, he also did good work in films like It, The Hunt for Red October and Charlie's Angels.

Image taken from askactor.com

Now this guy is another actor who skills I really am impressed with. I first watch him from Disney's TV-movie titled School of Life. For me, he did really well there, and his personality in that movie stood well beside his co-actor Ryan Reynolds. His other films include Bad Teacher and Ocean's Thirteen (He was that person who won the slots after Brad Pitt intentionally left a coin in its slot.)

Bob Gunton
Image taken from IMDb

Bob Gunton. I've watched him from a lot of movies, like Fracture, Bats, The Lincoln Lawyer and one of my favorites, Patch Adams. The films I just stated went on to become popular movies, and yet Gunton's name seem to easily slip through people's mind. Sad, considering he has a commanding presence on the screen.


John Turturro
Image taken from Wikipedia

Now this guy is a very popular one. You see his face and you immediately remember his cool roles in Transformers, You Don't Mess with the Zohan and Taking of Pelham 123. The thing is, and this is what qualified him in this short list of mine, you can't seem to remember his name. Turturro is a really cool and funny actor often overshadowed by his co-actors in a cast. His name got trumped by Edward Norton and Matt Damon in Rounders, Adam Sandler in Zohan and the big power cast of Transformers. Its a bit unfortunate, but he still does superb acting nevertheless.

Image taken from nilsfelicia.blogminds.com

His name may not bring much of a bell to many (I admit, even I forget his name sometimes) but he has had a lot of brilliant roles in a lot of blockbuster movies. Stanley Tucci is inarguably the best actor in this list - though this list is a bit short. Still, that doesn't undermine the acting prowess this guy has. From comedy to suspense to drama, this man is so versatile, so flexible, his acting is simply marvelous. His roles include: Nigel (Anne Hathaway's character's friend) in The Devil Wears Prada, the airport director in The Terminal, Julia's wife in Julie & Julia, the killer in The Lovely Bones, the Sunset Boulevard manager in Burlesque, Dr. Erskine (the doctor who pulled strings to make sure Captain Rogers gets recruited) in Captain America: The First Avenger, the talk show host Caesar in The Hunger Games - what more can you ask for?
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...